We're not against AMAs per se.
22 Apr 2021, 00:00
We're not against AMAs per se. We just think it's not productive to be doing sessions where there will likely be very few questions pertinent to the current state of the project beyond what's been shared in pinned messages here, on Twitter, in Medium, on meaningful posts here, in the white paper, in the bios on the website, on LinkedIns, on Github where ongoing project progress is updated, in news interviews, etc. We can't actually think of something answerable & relevant to the state of the project that's not been answered; and while we understand that this project is novel for the crypto world, it's not a crypto project. It's a project to solve problems. That's where the project started: no one controls their data, how can that be fixed? So we settled on blockchain as a decentralized tech stack, which is self-sustaining by way of cryptocurrency. And we honestly believe this is doable, so long as we just stay focused on that principal and not pay attention to the static around "crypto". To put it another way, blockchain is the dog & cryptocurrency is the tail. The tail doesn't wag the dog. We will continue to provide updates as things progress though, in ways and means that are efficacious, as we have been. And as things progress, we’ll continue to update using whatever forums that make sense for a particular or specific thing (as we have been). Hope this helps guys -- and btw, the quality of this community is indescribably great (by and large ha). And believe it or not, in a delegated proof of stake algo, the quality of the holders will indeed redound to a higher quality blockchain... Cheers all!